── Attaching packages ─────────────────────────────────────── tidyverse 1.3.2 ──
✔ ggplot2 3.3.6 ✔ purrr 0.3.4
✔ tibble 3.1.8 ✔ dplyr 1.0.9
✔ tidyr 1.2.0 ✔ stringr 1.4.0
✔ readr 2.1.2 ✔ forcats 0.5.1
── Conflicts ────────────────────────────────────────── tidyverse_conflicts() ──
✖ dplyr::filter() masks stats::filter()
✖ dplyr::lag() masks stats::lag()
Once you see it; you can’t unsee it.🤔
One benefit of learning a new framework is that it gives you the opportunity to compare and contrast with an established mental model.
I have been taking a Pandas Course from Kaggle and the lesson in Pandas involved establishing new variables in order to extract information from the data frame.
= [0, 1, 10, 100]
indices = ['country', 'province', 'region_1', 'region_2']
var = reviews.loc[indices, var] df
This seemed like a pain in order to select certain rows and columns, but it did open my perspective to a challenge I was having.
I have been working on reading data from a Qualtrics survey and there are nearly 147 columns and only about 117 are needed. (Long story on templated survey tools). To parse the data frame down, I had been using indexes for selections. Using an index is okay but frustrating as you are testing because the index selection breaks when there is a change to the survey. It was also a pain to write out all those terrible column names. The python script above made me think to create a vector to reference in a select statement.
Is this possible–yes it is, and now I seem to see it everywhere.
Below is a minimal example with the ‘mtcars’ data set.
<- mtcars %>%
remove ::select(drat, wt, qsec)
dplyr
<- names(remove) #create a vector with the names of the columns you eventually want to exclude
remove
<- mtcars %>%
new_mtcars ::select(-all_of(remove)) #within the select statement us the helper 'all_of' with the - operator to deselect the vector of interest.
dplyr
new_mtcars
mpg cyl disp hp vs am gear carb
Mazda RX4 21.0 6 160.0 110 0 1 4 4
Mazda RX4 Wag 21.0 6 160.0 110 0 1 4 4
Datsun 710 22.8 4 108.0 93 1 1 4 1
Hornet 4 Drive 21.4 6 258.0 110 1 0 3 1
Hornet Sportabout 18.7 8 360.0 175 0 0 3 2
Valiant 18.1 6 225.0 105 1 0 3 1
Duster 360 14.3 8 360.0 245 0 0 3 4
Merc 240D 24.4 4 146.7 62 1 0 4 2
Merc 230 22.8 4 140.8 95 1 0 4 2
Merc 280 19.2 6 167.6 123 1 0 4 4
Merc 280C 17.8 6 167.6 123 1 0 4 4
Merc 450SE 16.4 8 275.8 180 0 0 3 3
Merc 450SL 17.3 8 275.8 180 0 0 3 3
Merc 450SLC 15.2 8 275.8 180 0 0 3 3
Cadillac Fleetwood 10.4 8 472.0 205 0 0 3 4
Lincoln Continental 10.4 8 460.0 215 0 0 3 4
Chrysler Imperial 14.7 8 440.0 230 0 0 3 4
Fiat 128 32.4 4 78.7 66 1 1 4 1
Honda Civic 30.4 4 75.7 52 1 1 4 2
Toyota Corolla 33.9 4 71.1 65 1 1 4 1
Toyota Corona 21.5 4 120.1 97 1 0 3 1
Dodge Challenger 15.5 8 318.0 150 0 0 3 2
AMC Javelin 15.2 8 304.0 150 0 0 3 2
Camaro Z28 13.3 8 350.0 245 0 0 3 4
Pontiac Firebird 19.2 8 400.0 175 0 0 3 2
Fiat X1-9 27.3 4 79.0 66 1 1 4 1
Porsche 914-2 26.0 4 120.3 91 0 1 5 2
Lotus Europa 30.4 4 95.1 113 1 1 5 2
Ford Pantera L 15.8 8 351.0 264 0 1 5 4
Ferrari Dino 19.7 6 145.0 175 0 1 5 6
Maserati Bora 15.0 8 301.0 335 0 1 5 8
Volvo 142E 21.4 4 121.0 109 1 1 4 2
Conclusion
Learning python helped me shake up my mental model and apply it to my R workflow.